Current:Home > BackJack Daniel's v. poop-themed dog toy in a trademark case at the Supreme Court-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Jack Daniel's v. poop-themed dog toy in a trademark case at the Supreme Court
View Date:2024-12-23 19:32:16
The U.S. Supreme Court devoted spent more than an hour and a half on Wednesday chewing on a trademark question that pits the iconic Jack Daniel's trademark against a chewy dog toy company that is making money by lampooning the whiskey.
Ultimately the case centers on.....well, dog poop.
Lisa Blatt, the Jack Daniel's lawyer, got right to the point with her opening sentence. "This case involves a dog toy that copies Jack Daniel's trademark and trade dress and associates its whiskey with dog poop," she told the justices.
Indeed, Jack Daniel's is trying to stop the sale of that dog toy, contending that it infringes on its trademark, confuses consumers, and tarnishes its reputation. VIP, the company that manufactures and markets the dog toy, says it is not infringing on the trademark; it's spoofing it.
What the two sides argued
The toy looks like a vinyl version of a Jack Daniel's whiskey bottle, but the label is called Bad Spaniels, features a drawing of a spaniel on the chewy bottle, and instead of promising 40% alcohol by volume, instead promises "43% poo," and "100% smelly." VIP says no reasonable person would confuse the toy with Jack Daniel's. Rather, it says its product is a humorous and expressive work, and thus immune from the whiskey company's charge of patent infringement.
At Wednesday's argument, the justices struggled to reconcile their own previous decisions enforcing the nation's trademark laws and what some of them saw as a potential threat to free speech.
Jack Daniel's argued that a trademark is a property right that by its very nature limits some speech. "A property right by definition in the intellectual property area is one that restricts speech," said Blatt. "You have a limited monopoly on a right to use a name that's associated with your good or service."
Making the contrary argument was VIP's lawyer, Bennet Cooper. "In our popular culture, iconic brands are another kind of celebrity," he said. "People are constitutionally entitled to talk about celebrities and, yes, even make fun of them."
No clear sign from justices
As for the justices, they were all over the place, with conservative Justice Samuel Alito and liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor both asking questions about how the first amendment right of free speech intersects with trademark laws that are meant to protect brands and other intellectual property.
Assume, asked Sotomayor, that someone uses a political party logo, and creates a T-shirt with a picture of an obviously drunk Elephant, and a message that says, "Time to sober up America," and then sells it on Amazon. Isn't that a message protected by the First Amendment?
Justice Alito observed that if there is a conflict between trademark protection and the First Amendment, free speech wins. Beyond that, he said, no CEO would be stupid enough to authorize a dog toy like this one. "Could any reasonable person think that Jack Daniel's had approved this use of the mark?" he asked.
"Absolutely," replied lawyer Blatt, noting that business executives make blunders all the time. But Alito wasn't buying it. "I had a dog. I know something about dogs," he said. "The question is not what the average person would think. It's whether this should be a reasonable person standard, to simplify this whole thing."
But liberal Justice Elena Kagan and conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch repeatedly looked for an off ramp, a way for this case to be sent back to the lower court with instructions to either screen out or screen in some products when considering trademark infringement.
Kagan in particular did not find the dog toy remotely funny.
"This is a standard commercial product." she said. "This is not a political T-shirt. It's not a film. It's not an artistic photograph. It's nothing of those things."
What's more, she said, "I don't see the parody, but, you know, whatever."
At the end of the day, whatever the court is going to do with this case remained supremely unclear. Indeed, three of the justices were remarkably silent, giving no hints of their thinking whatsoever.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Chicago Bears will ruin Caleb Williams if they're not careful | Opinion
- Rob Schneider seeks forgiveness from daughter Elle King after 'fat camp' claims
- Streamer stayed awake for 12 days straight to break a world record that doesn't exist
- The president of Columbia University has resigned, effective immediately
- Alexandra Daddario Shares Candid Photo of Her Postpartum Body 6 Days After Giving Birth
- 'Truffles is just like me:' How a Pennsylvania cat makes kids feel proud to wear glasses
- Jordan Chiles Olympic Medal Controversy: USA Gymnastics Reveal Further Issues With Ruling
- ATTN: The Viral UGG Tazz Slippers Are in Stock RN, Get Them Before They Sell out Ahead of Fall
- Florida State can't afford to fire Mike Norvell -- and can't afford to keep him
- 'Emily in Paris': How the Netflix comedy gets serious with a 'complex' Me Too story
Ranking
- Mike Tyson employs two trainers who 'work like a dream team' as Jake Paul fight nears
- Streamer stayed awake for 12 days straight to break a world record that doesn't exist
- Pro-Palestinian protesters who blocked road near Sea-Tac Airport to have charges dropped
- Collin Gosselin Says He Was Discharged from the Marines Due to Being Institutionalized by Mom Kate
- Elon Musk says 'SNL' is 'so mad' Trump won as he slams Dana Carvey's impression
- Justice Department defends Boeing plea deal against criticism by 737 Max crash victims’ families
- football player, 14, dies after collapsing during practice in Alabama
- J.J. McCarthy's season-ending injury is a setback, but Vikings might find upside
Recommendation
-
Georgia public universities and colleges see enrollment rise by 6%
-
Water crisis in Mississippi capital developed during failures in oversight, watchdog says
-
J.J. McCarthy's season-ending injury is a setback, but Vikings might find upside
-
2nd man charged in 2012 killing of retired Indiana farmer who was shot to death in his home
-
12 college students charged with hate crimes after assault in Maryland
-
Australian Olympic Committee hits out at criticism of controversial breaker Rachael Gunn
-
Horoscopes Today, August 14, 2024
-
David Hasselhoff Is a Grandpa, Daughter Taylor Welcomes First Baby With Madison Fiore